Showing posts with label peer reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label peer reviews. Show all posts

Saturday, February 7, 2015

Grit Work for Nonfiction Finish

February 7, 2015 Update

...The American Humanitarian Spirit...1979-1986 

Authorship is about more than writing. Someone's eye must always focus ahead to a six-month publishing debut.  

With my  husband's permission, I update progress on his book manuscript, partly to honor the details of developing a book for publishing. Here is a February 2015 update, with preliminary info, also added today to post archived at My News and Views Blog, May 17, 2014. 

Jim Purcell's MS is a massive work with narrative and field accounts before and after the Fall of Saigon, April 30, 1975. Vietnamese allies that rushed to the U. S. Embassy for a helicopter on a tower on the roof were only the beginning of an unfolding tragedy. What the U. S. had to learn from the events of the Vietnam-Cambodia-Laos triangle equipped the nation to lead the world to revive its humanitarian spirit internationally within citizenry, governments, communities, churches, synagogues, and volunteer organizations.

The refugee decade, as it came to be known, required the development of policies and procedures for quick, life-saving responses in Southeast Asia, Africa (Sudan, Ethiopia, Somalia), the Middle East, the Caribbean, Eastern Europe, and Russia. Millions of lives depended on decisions and protocols made by people near and far away. Refugees would rarely see these men and women honoring and seeking to save and protect their lives. That was OK as long as the missions were accomplished.  

Files by category for the manuscript's news clippings and reports now allow faster fact-checking. End notes, the footnote-type info at the end of chapters, are fully referenced.

All MS sources have been listed according to Chicago Manual of Style formats for books, articles, journals, reports and other references according to chapters.

The list work by the author in long-hand by chapter is already typed and alphabetized in a Word document. The handwritten citations take up roughly 50 pages. I do not mind what I'm doing now, which is to type such details into pages for the end of each chapter.

Gathering publisher and copyright data online is what I volunteered for, as well as using front matter of print resources in the author's research collection.

Digital document tracking has gone along carefully, and still there are headache times for JNP and Andy Michaels. (If this interests you, use the link above, look at the graphics down the page, and see why Andy developed a system for the author.)

Two knowledgeable readers (link)--"they-were-there-too"--have digital and print copies to read and make comments. The link above goes to the sometimes underestimated Wikipedia, which has the best correct description and explanation of peer review(er) I have seen.

If the query letter (samples) succeeds in catching the interest of a key, professional, successful book agent, the book proposal (BP-sample ideas) will likely come into play; Jim's Work is not at that stage yet, but soon. The era of starting a book proposal helped additions, rethinking, and enlargement of the MS, for the better.

The author usually bears the bulk of work to gather and select resource information, as well as to keep track of the exact source of each quote, notation, or citation, including interviews by date. Plus organizing and writing the book well!

Every draft has made a better, stronger, more interesting, thrilling, and informative account of an era in U. S. history, leadership, and humanitarian response. That's my take on it.


*******

Copyright (c) 2015 James N. Purcell, Jr. and Jean P. Purcell

Saturday, September 13, 2014

Affordable Ideas and Actions for Writers

"I would advise anyone who aspires to a writing career that before developing his talent he would be wise to develop a thick hide.”
—Harper Lee
WritersDigest.com - "72 of the best quotes for writers"
_______________________
The writer cried, "Help!" for writing. He used Google for writing help. A list of possible resources appeared, many with unaffordable, for the writer, price tags, "unaffordable" meaning "no disposable cash on hand to cover the entire package."

The writer felt downcast, lacking the necessary disposable funds. He (or she) did not realize then that there was no requirement, at least not yet, to pay for as much help as assumed.

Here are a few key no-cost steps the writer could take now:
  1. Find the best local writers' group for your needs; if you do not find a helpful group, then form one, based on shared writing needs and interests;
  2. Read often about the writing, proposal, query, and relationship skills you need to improve, and take time to study and practice them;
  3. Find good, free resources on-line;
  4. Write, write, write!
  5. Be aware of a published writer or teacher who might agree to mentor you or your writing, for whatever agreed time; it does no harm to ask.
Note: If a good professional relationship develops with a mentor, be sure to treasure the other person's willingness to advise or encourage you; guard against taking for granted the help or insights received. As a mentor to many writers for over 12 years, I appreciate every sincere "Thank you" every time.

Cut through any shyness you might have about asking other, more skilled writers to read and react to your new articles, short stories, poems, or chapters. Most writers are generous to give at least some feedback. Note: consider the feedback while not starting a debate if you feel wounded by it. Aim, instead, to consider and possibly advance because of it.

I hope that you will use any of these ideas that fit your needs now. I encourage you to grow as a persevering writer without any regrets about spending finances you did not have, could not afford, or did not need to spend, regardless of the availability of financial resources.

Things to think about, link.

If you found this article helpful, I hope you will share it on Twitter.com, Facebook, LinkedIn, and other networking groups .



Wednesday, April 6, 2011

DO PEER REVIEWS STRENGTHEN YOUR CASE?

Combination of 20px and rotated version of 20p...Image via Wikipedia
by Jean Purcell


I develop peer review forms for authors. Our company, Opine Publishing, is in the process of another round of reviews by peers for a new book by an author new to our company. It's an exciting time!
     Yet, when I sent the book I wrote to a publisher (my penname was Jane Bullard) years ago, before I became a publisher, I did not know about peer reviews outside academic circles. I did hire a book analyst and an editor to look at the first chapter and the entire manuscript, respectively. 
     Later, as founder of a start up small press, I attended a three-day workshop with self-publishing guru Dan Poynter, He said that a major help for advance feedback is the peer review.  (Equally important to Dan is professional cover design.) Peer reviewers are people invited by the author, or the editor. Those that agreeto participate, read all or parts of a manuscript and give feedback. Peer reviewers are people who know the subject or sub-topics of the book in progress.
     Did Poynter's advice about peer reviews prove helpful? Having had some years of experience with peer reviews, including designing specific review forms for authors, I would not send a book to a printer without putting its manuscript, almost ready for print, through a peer review process.
     Yes, a peer review definitely can strengthen a book's case. And sometimes reviewers allow their comments to be used within the book or on the cover. That's beyond review, to endorsement, which is priceless when it comes from thoughtful advance readers.
     The main advantage of the peer review process is to let the author and publisher know if the most important messages of a book are reaching readers' interests, including emotional impact and enlightening experience and information. That's the general picture, which well designed questions can achieve. A well planned peer review process can give a forthcoming book the kind of vetting every book needs. 

Copyright (c) 2011 Jean Purcell and Opinari and Opine Publishing

Enhanced by Zemanta